Dismissed
Antony v. Jacob George Paul
Kerala HCRCRev./311/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V.
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 20TH ASHADHA, 1941
RCRev..No.311 of 2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RCA 88/2015 of RENT CONTROL APPELLATE COURT / ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT -V ERNAKULAM DATED 31-07-2017
AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A. NO. 6725/2015 IN RCP 45/2014 of RENT CONTROL CONTROL COURT, ERNAKULAM / III ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF DATED 18-11-2015
REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
ANTONY, AGED 48, S/O.XAVIER, EDATHURUTHIL HOUSE, THEVARA P.O., KOCHI-13.
BY ADV. SRI.MANU ROY
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
JACOB GEORGE PAUL S/O.JOY, KUTTAMPARAMBIL, THEVARA, KOCHI-682 013.
BY ADVS. SRI.A.BALAGOPALAN SMT.P.SEENA SRI.A.RAJAGOPALAN SRI.M.S.IMTHIYAZ AHAMMED
THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11.07.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RCR.311/2017
2
ORDER
A. Hariprasad J.
There was no representation for the revision
petitioner on the earlier posting dates. Today also there is
no representation. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed
for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
A.HARIPRASAD
JUDGE
Sd/-
SHIRCY V. JUDGE
sb
ANTONY
JACOB GEORGE PAUL
A. HARIPRASAD
SHIRCY V.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court