Rajeevan v. Joy
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner landlord sought to direct the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur, to finalize a pending appeal against an eviction order within a fixed time frame, citing prejudice caused by delay, without issuing notice to the respondent tenant.
What did the court decide?
Respondent directed to dispose of R.C.A No.165 of 2016 within three months from receipt of judgment copy.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V.
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 20TH ASHADHA, 1941
OP (RC).No.116 of 2019
RCA 165/2016 OF RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY, THRISSUR.
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT :
RAJEEVAN, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.THEKKEWARRIATH E.SANKARA WARRIER, KEERAMKULAMGARA DESOM, CHEMBUKKAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.
BY ADVS. SRI.LINDONS C.DAVIS SMT.E.U.DHANYA
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT :
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to direction for the finalization of pending appeal within a specific time frame.
Whether notice to the respondent was necessary before disposing the petition under the facts.
Whether the delay in disposal of R.C.A No.165 of 2016 warrants judicial intervention.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajeevan
- respondent
Joy
Coram
A.Hariprasad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court