R.v.Khalid v. Ignatious
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Indian Constitution to address the delay in disposing of a Rent Control Appellate Authority appeal. The Court directed the authority to dispose of the pending appeal within four months.
What did the court decide?
The Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur is directed to consider and dispose of the pending RCA within a period of four months from today.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANNIE JOHN
MONDAY ,THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 29TH MAGHA, 1940
OP (RC).No. 30 of 2019
PETITIONER/:
R.V.KHALID, AGED 69 YEARS S/O.RAYAMMARAKARVEETIL MAMMUTTY, GURUVAYOOR AMSOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
RESPONDENT/S:
IGNATIOUS, S/O.CHAKRAMAKAL FRANCIS, CHAVAKKAD AMSOM DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR-680 311.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur should be directed to dispose of the pending appeal within a specific time frame due to delay.
Whether the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India can be invoked for the speedy disposal of a rent control appeal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.V.KHALID
- respondent
IGNATIOUS
Coram
K.HARILAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court