P.K.Raju v. Wilson
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of the petition, declined to issue notice to the respondent, and directed the Munsiff Court to dispose of the underlying suit by June 30, 2019.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the court below to dispose of O.S. No. 268 of 2016 on merits by June 30, 2019; notice to respondent declined.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
TUESDAY ,THE 02ND DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1941 OP(C).No. 855 of 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 268/2016 of MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
PETITIONER:
P.K.RAJU AGED 55 YEARS S/O.LATE. VARKEY KUNJU POKKATHAYIL HOUSE, VENGOOR.P.O, PRALAYIKKAD, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-683546
BY ADVS. SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR SRI.R.RANJITH
RESPONDENT:
WILSON, S/O.VARKEY, POKKATHAYIL HOUSE, IRINGOLE.P.O, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-683548
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to issue notice to the respondent to expedite the disposal of the underlying suit filed in the Munsiff Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.K. Raju
- respondent
Wilson
Coram
Sunil Thomas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court