Abdulsalam v. Nisam
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner complained about unnecessary adjournment of an Execution Application without orders. The High Court refused to mandate a specific disposal timeline due to data unavailability but directed the lower court to decide the application expeditiously.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the court below to take up E.A.No.30 of 2019 as expeditiously as possible and pass appropriate orders.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
TUESDAY ,THE 02ND DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1941
OP(C).No. 476 of 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 182/2013 of MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTARAKKARA DATED 19-12-2018
PETITIONER:
ABDULSALAM AGED 82 YEARS S/O HASAN BAVA, PALAKKADA HOUSE, KADAKKAL MURI, KADAKKAL VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
1 NISAM S/O ABDUL SHEREEF, PALAKKADA HOUSE, KADAKKAL MURI, KADAKKAL VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 506.
2 NAZEER S/O. ABDUL SHEREEF, PALAKKADA HOUSE, KADAKKAL MURI, KADAKKAL VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 506.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the court below to dispose of an expedited application within a specific time frame.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ABDULSALAM AGED 82 YEARS S/O HASAN BAVA
- respondent
NISAM S/O ABDUL SHEREEF
- respondent
NAZEER S/O. ABDUL SHEREEF
- respondent
THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADAKKAL POLICE STATION, KOTTARAKKARA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court