Ravi, v. Ramesh
Case brief
What is this about?
<u>The petitioner sought to prove that the bank withdrew money without his presence by demanding CCTV footage. The bank stated footage was erased after 90 days. The High Court declined to interfere with the lower court's interim dismissal of the application, while reserving objections to observations made at paragraph 5 of the lower court order.</u>
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2019 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1941
OP(C).No. 1220 of 2019
(IN OS 105/2018 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,IRINJALAKUDA )
PETITIONER/S:
RAVI, AGED 73 YEARS S/O. THAIVALATH UNNI, KUZHUR DESOM, THIRUMUKKULAM VILLAGE, CHALAKKUDY TALUK.
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN SRI.ABEL ANTONY
RESPONDENT/S:
- 1 RAMESH, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. THAIVALATH RAVI, KUZHUR DESOM, THIRUMUKKULAM VILLAGE, CHALAKKUDY TALUK, PIN-680307.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Sub Court's order dismissing the application to record CCTV footage of a bank withdrawal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAVI
- respondent
RAMESH
- respondent
THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, KUZHOOR BRANCH
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court