Subair v. M.S.Manoharan
Case brief
What is this about?
The court permitted the petitioner to pay the execution decree balance in ten monthly installments upon the respondent's consent and kept execution proceedings in abeyance.
What did the court decide?
Permitted payment in ten equal monthly installments; execution proceedings kept in abeyance for ten months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 8TH KARTHIKA, 1941
OP(C).No.1118 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ST 53/2015 OF MUNSIFF COURT, VAIKOM
PETITIONER/S:
SUBAIR AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. SAITHUMUHAMMED, PULINTHURUTHIYIL HOUSE, NADUVILE VILLAGE, VAIKOM P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-686 141
BY ADVS. SRI.P.P.BIJU SMT.M.B.SHYNI SRI.DEEPAK RAJ
RESPONDENT/S:
M.S.MANOHARAN S/O. SREEDHARAN, PRASATHIYIL HOUSE, VADAYAR P.O, KIZHAKKEKKARA, VADAYAR VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-686 605
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUBAIR
- respondent
M.S.MANOHARAN
Coram
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court