Antony v.D., v. Sumi Jose
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed the transfer order of a case from Family Court, Irinjalakkuda to Family Court, Thrissur to avoid prejudice to an unemployed wife. The court dismissed the opposing transfer prayer but exempted the petitioners from appearing.
What did the court decide?
O.P. 47 of 2019 transferred from Family Court, Irinjalakkuda to Family Court, Thrissur; O.P. 1746 of 2018 not transferred; petitioners exempted from personal appearance
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 7TH KARTHIKA, 1941
Tr.P(C).No.226 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 1746/2018 OF FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR
PETITIONER/S:
1 ANTONY V.D., AGED 71 YEARS S/O.DEVASSY, VADAKKUMPURAM HOUSE, CANAL ROAD, P.O.ANNAMANADA, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
- 2 SELIN ANTONY,
W/O.ANTONY, VADAKKUMPURAM HOUSE, CANAL ROAD, P.O.ANNAMANADA, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR
RESPONDENT/S:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to transfer two pending Family Court orders between Family Court, Irinjalakkuda and Family Court, Thrissur based on convenience and prejudice.
Whether the in-laws should be exempted from personal appearance in the transferred proceedings.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sumi Jose
- respondent
Sumi Jose
- respondent
Sibi Antony
- petitioner
Antony V.D. and Selin Antony
- respondent
Antony V.D. and Selin Antony
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court