The High Court of Kerala dismissed the Matrimonial Appeal No.71 of 2012 filed by T.P.M.Aleema Kunhi Beevi as infructuous, without addressing substantive merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019/27TH BHADRA, 1941
Mat.Appeal No.71 OF 2012
AGAINST THE ORDER IN UNNUMBERED O.P....... OF 2012 ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM DTD.20.1.2012
APPELLANT:
T.P.M.ALEEMA KUNHI BEEVI, D/O.LATE SAID UMMER HAJI ATTAKOYA THANGAL, THIUTTIYAD, NEAR HIRA CENTRE, MAVOOR ROAD, PUTHIYARA (P.O), KOZHIKODE-4, KASABA VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE TALUK.
BY ADVS. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.DILIP
RESPONDENTS:
1 NAMBIDIKKAND ABDUL SAMMAD, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.KOYAPPARAMBATH MALIYEKKAL MOIDEEN KOYA, C/O.SATHYAPALAN, S/O.MOOTHAM VEETIL CHANDU, HOUSE NO.44/2030, PUTHIYARA (PO), KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 004.
2 SATHYAPALAN, AGED 71 YEARS, S/O.MOOTHAM VEETTIL CHANDU, HOUSE NO.44/2030, PUTHIYARA (PO), KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 004.
R2 BY ADV. SMT.M.MANJU R2 BY ADV. SRI.R.SUDHISH R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.R.RANJITH
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18.09.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mat.Appeal No.71 of 2012
..2..
JUDGMENT
A.M.Shaffique, J.
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the
matter has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the Mat.Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE
Sd/-
N.ANIL KUMAR, JUDGE
skj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Matrimonial Appeal requires adjudication or can be dismissed as infructuous.
T.P.M.ALEEMA KUNHI BEEVI
NAMBIDIKKAND ABDUL SAMMAD
SATHYAPALAN
A.M.SHAFFIQUE
N.ANIL KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
