Sachidanandan v. Ramya
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed an appeal and connected contempt application due to the appellant's failure to prosecute the matter properly within a reasonable time.
What did the court decide?
Dismissed both the contempt application and the matrimonial appeal.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019/27TH BHADRA, 1941
Mat.Appeal No.582 OF 2012
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 246/2010 DATED 27-03-2012 OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD
APPELLANT:RESPONDENT :-
SACHIDANANDAN, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.SREEDHARAN NAIR, NO.7, KARUN STREET, PERAMBOOR, CHENNAI, NOW AT T.N.H.R & C.E. STAFF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, 119, UTHAMAGANDHISALAI, CHENNAI - 600 034.
BY ADVS. SRI.R.HARIKRISHNAN SRI.P.ARUN KUMAR (MONCOMPU) SRI.R.RAMESH SMT.SINDHU SARAH THOMAS SRI.R.UMASANKAR
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sachidanandan
- respondent
Ramya
Coram
A.M.Shaffique
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court