Dismissed
Harshan v. Leela
Kerala HCMat.Appeal/386/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court treated two matrimonial appeals as abated because the appellant died, and noted that no steps were taken to implead legal heirs before dismissing the appeals.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
¶4
&
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR
¶6
MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 27TH JYAISHTA, 1941
¶7
Mat.Appeal.No.386 of 2013
¶8
AGAINST THE ORDER IN OP 1061/2006 of FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR DATED 13.2.2013
¶9
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
¶10
HARSHAN
¶11
AGED 62, S/O. THER VELU, KUNDAZHIYOOR DESOM, ENGANDIYOOR AMSOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK.
¶12
BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- respondent
LEELA
- respondent
RAJANI
- respondent
RAJI
- respondent
RAJITHA
- respondent
GOPAKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court