Muraleedharan v. Radhika
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed two matrimonial appeals (Nos. 737/2011 and 254/2012) because the learned counsel for the appellant had filed a memo stating that the matters were not pressed.
What did the court decide?
None. The appeals were dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 27TH JYAISHTA, 1941
Mat.Appeal.No.737 of 2011
AGAINST THE ORDER IN OP 1085/2009 of FAMILY COURT,KOZHIKODE DATED 20-09-2010
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
MURALEEDHARAN
S/O.NARAYANAN, AGED 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT USHUS, P.O.KUTHIRAVATTOM, CALICUT 673 016.
BY ADV. SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Murali Edharan
- respondent
Radhika
Coram
A.M. Shaffique
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court