Shaik Musthafa v. Fathima
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against a Family Court judgment dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant was absent from the hearing held on 27.02.2019.
What did the court decide?
Matrimonial appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BABU
WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 8TH PHALGUNA, 1940
Mat.Appeal.No. 171 of 2012
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 844/2008 of FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD DATED 24-11-2011
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
SHAIK MUSTHAFA AGED 32 YEARS S/O. MATHERSHA RAWTHER, CHINNA VEEDU, THEKKATHI BAVA STREET, PUTHUNAGARAM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shaiik Musthafa
- respondent
Fathima
Coram
A.M. Shaffique
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court