In a contempt of court writ case, the petitioner submitted that directions were complied with belatedly after receiving amounts. The court held it inappropriate to take further action and closed the contempt proceedings.
Contempt of court proceedings closed by dismissal of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
THURSDAY ,THE 07TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 18TH MAGHA, 1940 Con.Case(C).No. 880 of 2018 IN WP(C). 35910/2017
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC 35910/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
REKHA N.R. AGED 34 YEARS, W/O.ARUN, L.P.S.A., A.U.P.S., AMBALAPAD, KUNDUKKAD P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN680028.
BY ADVS. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. SRI.K.R.GANESH
RESPONDENT/S:
1 N.R. MALLIKA (HUSBAND'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR680003. 2 P.V.SIDHIQUE (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, WADAKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR-680582. 3 SMT. REHUMA BEEVI M., FATHER'S MAME AND FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SUB TREASURY OFFICER, THALAPPILLY, WADAKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR-680582(ADDL. R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 8.10.2018 IN I.A.5/2018). 680582 4 SMT. SHYLAJA AGE AND HUSBAND'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SUB TREASURY OFFICER, THALAPPILLY, WADAKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR-680582 (ADDL. R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 4.1.2019 IN I.A.1/2019). BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.GP B VINOD
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 880 of 2018 2
JUDGMENT
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner
that the directions contained in the judgment have been complied
with, though belatedly. In view of the fact that the amounts have been received by the petitioner, I do not deem it appropriate to take any further action in the matter. The contempt of court case is
therefore closed.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE
Ac
Con.Case(C).No. 880 of 2018 3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
| ANNEXURE A1 | TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 1.6.2007 OF THE PETITIONER |
|---|---|
| ANNEXURE A2 | TRUE COPY OF THE REJECTION ORDER DATED 4.12.2007 ISSUED BY THE AEO |
| ANNEXURE A3 | TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 6.12.2011 ISSUED BY THE AEO |
| ANNEXURE A4 | TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.5.2015 IN W.P. NO.2576/2012 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT |
| ANNEXURE A5 | TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.D.DIS/C/2238/2015(5) DATED 11.1.2016 ISSUED BY THE AEO |
| ANNEXURE A6 | TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.F2/20391/2016/DPI DATED 7.7.2016 ISSUED BY THE DPI |
| ANNEXURE A7 | TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 5.9.2016 IN WPC.29411/2016 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT |
| ANNEXURE A8 | TRUE COPY OF G.O(RT) NO.867/2017/G.E. DATED 28.3.2017 |
| ANNEXURE A9 | TRUE COPY OF G.O(RT) NO.1033/2017 G.E.DATED 7.4.2017 |
| ANNEXURE A10 | TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 22.6.2017 ISSUED BY THE MANAGER |
| ANNEXURE A11 | TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 29.6.2017 ISSUED BY THE HEADMISRESS |
| ANNEXURE A12 | TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 12.10.2017 OF THE PETITIONER |
| ANNEXURE A13 | TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 1.3.2018 IN WPC.35910/2018 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT |
| ANNEXURE A14 | TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.C/6013/17 DATED 30.4.2018 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT |
| ANNEXURE A15 | TRUE COPY OF STAY ORDER DATED 15.5.2018 IN WPC.15870/2018 |
| ANNEXURE A16 | TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 19.6.2018 IN WPC.15870/2018 |
Con.Case(C).No. 880 of 2018 4
RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE R3 (A) A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.346775/SLI/2016/FIN DATED 03.12.2016 ANNEURE R3(B) A TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.NO.57/13 DATED 30.01.2013.
//TRUE COPY// Sd/PA TO JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt of court proceedings should be closed following compliance with earlier directions.
Rekha N.R.
N.R. Mallika
P.V. Sidhiqque
Smt. Rehuma Beevi M.
Smt. Shylaja
Anu Sivaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
