Petitioner filed a contempt petition for non-compliance with prior directives. Learned counsel reported compliance. Court closed the case accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY ,THE 08TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 19TH MAGHA, 1940 Con.Case(C).No. 72 of 2019 IN WP(C). 2305/2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 2305/2018 DATED 23.01.2018 of HIGHCOURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
SHAHUL HAMEED V.
S/O.VELLAPPA RAWTHER (LATE), MUTHALAMTHODEKALAM, KUTTIPALLAM P.O., CHITTUR, PALAKKAD - 678 101.
BY ADV. SMT.R.S.ASWINI SANKAR
RESPONDENT/S:
DR.P.SURESH BABU IAS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, KERALA - 678 001.
BY SRI.P.M.MANOJ, SR.GP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 72 of 2019 IN WP(C). 2305/2018 2
JUDGMENT
This Contempt of Court case is filed by the
petitioner complaining that the directives contained in the judgment dated 23.01.2018, is not complied with.
directives are complied with. So I do not find any reason to pursue this Contempt of Court case any further.
This Contempt of Court case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P.CHALY
JUDGE
uu
08.02.2019
Con.Case(C).No. 72 of 2019 IN WP(C). 2305/2018 3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.(C) NO.2305 OF 2018 DATED 23/01/2018.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
Shahul Hameed
DR.P.Suresh Babu
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
