Geogy George.K., v. Kamala Vardhana Rao
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition for non-compliance of directives issued in a previous judgment. Counsel for respondents satisfied the court that directives were complied with, leading to closure of the case.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed as directives are found to be complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF JULY 2019 / 11TH ASHADHA, 1941
Con.Case(C).No.705 of 2019 IN WP(C). 294/2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.01.2018 IN WP(C) 294/2018
PETITIONER/S:
GEOGY GEORGE.K., AGED 56 YEARS S/O K.J.GEORGE,KOTTUKAPPILLY HOUSE, PALAKKAD-2 VILLAGE,KALPATHY.P.O, PALAKKAD-678003.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.BABU THOMAS SMT.MARYKUTTY BABU
RESPONDENT/S:
1 KAMALA VARDHANA RAO S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
GEOGY GEORGE.K.
- respondent
KAMALA VARDHANA RAO
- respondent
JEEVARAJ.M.N
- respondent
SREELEKHA.P
- respondent
RAJESH.M
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court