K.v.Vasumathy v. Reeja.M.S
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners complained of non-compliance with directives in a prior judgment. The court examined affidavits and memos revealing an adverse order was passed, leading to closure of contempt proceedings without prejudice.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed leaving liberty to challenge the adverse order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF JULY 2019 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1941
Con.Case(C).No.817 of 2019 IN WP(C). 34788/2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 34788/2018 of HIGHCOURT
PETITIONER/S:
1 K.V.VASUMATHY AGED 57 YEARS W/O. SREEDHARAN, RESIDING AT SAKUNTHALA, OZHUVUPARA, PALLASSENA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
2 P.S SREEJA, AGED 43 YEARS W/O. SADANANDAN, RESIDING AT SAKUNTHALA, OZHUVUPARA, PALLASSENA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H.
RESPONDENT/S:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to pursue contempt proceedings given an affidavit and memo showing an order passed against the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.V. VASUMATHY
- petitioner
P.S SREEJA
- respondent
REEJA.M.S
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court