Jose v. Dr. Renu Raj
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner's counsel submitted that directions from the underlying writ petition had been complied with. The Court found no cause for contempt and closed the case.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941
Con.Case(C).No.414 OF 2018 IN WP(C). 6335/2017
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC 6335/2017 DATED 08-112017 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C):
JOSE AGED 44 YEARS 44 YEARS, S/O. DEVASSYKUTTY, CHEMBAKASSERY HOUSE, THANISSERY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT IN WP(C):
DR. RENU RAJ
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, THRISSUR, PIN-680003.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jose
- respondent
Dr. Renu Raj
Coram
P.B. Suresh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court