Valsala, v. Regimon
Case brief
What is this about?
This contumacious case was declared infructuous and closed as the impugned order underlying the petition was set aside in a subsequent writ petition during the pendency of the contempt proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of Court case closed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941 Con.Case(C).No.1433 OF 2019 IN WP(C). 2014/2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 2014/2019(B) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
VALSALA, AGED 63 YEARS W/O. GOPALAN, UTHRAM VEEDU, KURAMPALA, PANDALAM P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA.
BY ADV. SRI.UNNI. K.K. (EZHUMATTOOR)
RESPONDENT/S:
REGIMON
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, PANDALAM THEKKEKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THATTAYIL P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689645
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Valsala
- respondent
Regimon
Coram
Shaji P. Chaly
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court