Contempt of court case regarding an order passed in WP(C). 19858/2018. The court closed the contempt proceedings leaving the petitioner's right to challenge the impugned order open.
The contempt of court case is closed, with the petitioner's right to challenge the impugned order left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
MONDAY ,THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 22ND MAGHA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 109 of 2019 IN WP(C). 19858/2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 19858/2018 of HIGHCOURT
PETITIONER/S:
M.C.JOSE, AGED 59 YEARS S/O LATE M.A.CHANDY,MATTAPPALLIL HOUSE,KATTAPPANA P.O.IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685 508
BY ADV. SRI.N.P.PRAJEESH
RESPONDENT/S:
1 JEEVAN BABU.K,I.A.S, (AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER),THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI, OFFICE AT PAINAVU,PIN 685 503.
2 S.SREEJITH, AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER),THE TAHSILDAR, UNDUMBANCHOLA TALUK (NOW IDUKKI TALUK),IDUKKI DISTRICT,PIN 685 554
3 JAISON GEORGE, (AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER),THE VILLAGE OFFICER,KATTAPPANA VILLAGE,KATTAPPANA P.O.IDUKKI DISTRICT,PIN 685 508
BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
GP B VINITHA
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 109 of 2019 IN WP(C). 19858/2018 2
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an order has been passed adverse to the interest of the petitioner. Leaving open the right of the petitioner to challenge the order if so advised, the contempt of court case is closed.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN
JUDGE
Ac
Con.Case(C).No. 109 of 2019 IN WP(C). 19858/2018
3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1.10.2018 IN WPC NO 19858/2018 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to challenge the impugned order in the contempt proceedings.
M.C.Jose
Jeevan Babu.K
S.Sreejith
Jaison George
Anu Sivaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
