Shine Jose v. Abdul Hameed
Case brief
What is this about?
Court closed the contempt petition and dismissed it, stating the writ petition containing the interim order had been dismissed, leaving nothing for consideration.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed and dismissed as principal writ petition was dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY ,THE 08TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 19TH MAGHA, 1940 Con.Case(C).No. 95 of 2019 IN WP(C). 228/2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 228/2019 of HIGHCOURT
PETITIONER/S:
SHINE JOSE AGED 41 YEARS S/O.P.M.JOSEPH, HSST (COMPUTER SCIENCE), MES HSS, VANDANMEDU, IDUKKI - 685 551.
BY ADVS. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ KUM.A.ARUNA KUM.THULASI K. RAJ SMT.K.C.AISHWARYA SMT.RIYA RAYMOL IYPE SRI.VARUN C.VIJAY
RESPONDENT/S:
ABDUL HAMEED RETD.IPS, FATHERS NAME AND AGE ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER CORPORATE MANAGER, MES SCHOOL, MES FGM WOMENS COLLEGE, KANNUR ROAD, NADAKKAVU (P.O.), KOZHIKODE - 673 011.
SR.GP B VINOD
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shine Jose
- respondent
Abdul Hameed
Coram
Anu Sivaraman
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court