Disposed

Catholic Syrian Bank v. T.N. Ramasubrahmanian

Kerala HC22 Mar 2018WP(C)/9091/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioners, Catholic Syrian Bank, filed a writ petition seeking police protection for their head office due to apprehended hostilities from employee unions. The Court noted a settlement existed between the parties and no trouble currently persisted. Consequently, the Court ordered the writ petition be closed without costs. The civil court was directed that any actual violation be approached t

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed. No costs. Bank directed to raise bills for protection provided. Civil court to handle any future violations.

Catholic Syrian Bank Vs T.N. Ramasubrahmanian — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN &

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON

¶5

THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 1ST CHAITHRA, 1940

¶6

WP(C).No. 9091 of 2018

¶7

PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER

¶8

CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK REGISTERED OFFICE CSB BHAVAN, ST.MARYS COLLEGE ROAD, THRISSUR-20, REPRESENTED BY THE HEAD, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT.

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM) SRI.PRASANTH M.P

¶10

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

¶11

1. SRI.T.N. RAMASUBRAHMANIAN GENERAL SECRETARY, CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, MUSEUM ROAD, THRISSUR, PIN-680020.

¶12

2. SRI.JOBSON G. THERATTIL, GENERAL SECRETARY, CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK OFFICERS FEDERATION, ROOM NO.10/37/21, ADAM BAZAAR, RICE BAZAR EAST, THRISSUR, PIN-680001.

¶13

3. SRI.JERIN K JOHN

¶14

GENERAL SECRETARY,

¶15

CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK STAFF FEDERATION,

¶16

UDAYA BUILDING, COLLEGE ROAD,

¶17

THRISSUR, PIN-680001.

¶18

4. SRI.DAVIS P.A,

¶19

GENERAL SECRETARY,

¶20

CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK EMPLOYEES UNION,

¶21

RICE BAZAR, THRISSUR, PIN-680001.

¶22

5. SRI.N.D.NANDAKUMAR GENERAL SECRETARY, CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK RETIREES ASSOCIATION, KUNNATHUMANA LANE, 25/981-1B, TOP CORAL, THRISSUR, PIN-680001.

¶23

6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER EAST FORT POLICE STATION, THRISSUR, PIN-680005,

¶24

7. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

¶25

EAST FORT POLICE STATION,

¶26

THRISSUR, PIN-680005.

¶27

CONTD..2..

¶28

..2..

¶29

WP(C).No. 9091 of 2018

¶30

8. THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER, THRISSUR, PIN-680001.

¶31

9. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE THRISSUR RANGE, THRISSUR,

¶32

PIN-680001.

¶33

10. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.

¶34

R1-R5 BY ADV. SRI.B.ASHOK SHENOY R1-R5 BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GEORGE R1-R5 BY ADV. SRI.P.N.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR R1-R5 BY ADV. SRI.P.S.GIREESH R1-R5 BY ADV. SRI.RIYAL DEVASSY R BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.P.THAJUDDIN

¶35

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-03-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶36

WP(C).No. 9091 of 2018 (J)

¶37

APPENDIX

¶38

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶39

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.NO.410/2018 PENDING BEFORE THE MUNSIFFS COURT, THRISSUR, DATED 02.02.2018.
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF INJUNCTION PASSED BY THE MUNSIFFS COURT, THRISSUR IN I.A NO.1924/2018 IN O.S.NO.410/2018 DATED 02.02.2018.
EXHIBIT P3	TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 7TH RESPONDENT DATED 03.02.2018.
EXHIBIT P4	TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE UNION OF THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 12.02.2018.
EXHIBIT P5	TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE UNION OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 12.02.2018.
EXHIBIT P6	TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE UNION OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 12.02.2018.
EXHIBIT P7	TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE UNION OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 12.02.2018.
EXHIBIT P8	TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT DATED 23.02.2018.
EXHIBIT P9	TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN TO THE 8TH RESPONDENT DATED 24.02.2018.
EXHIBIT P10	TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS REPORT PUBLISHED IN DESHABHIMANI DAILY DATED 10.03.2018.
EXHIBIT P11	TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF THE EXTRA ORDINARY GENERAL MEETING.
EXHIBIT P12	TRUE COPY OF THE POSTER AFFIXED BY THE RESPONDENT 1 TO 5 IN FRONT OF THE HEAD OFFICE OF THE PETITIONER BANK
EXHIBIT P13	TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION GIVEN TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT DATED 12.03.2018.
EXHIBIT P14	TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS REPORT PUBLISHED IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY DATED 15.03.2018.
RESPONDENT	S EXHIBITS: NIL

// TRUE COPY //

P.A TO JUDGE

K. VINOD CHANDRAN & ASHOK MENON, JJ

¶44

================================

¶45

W.P.(C) No.9091 of 2018

¶46

=======================

¶47

Dated this the 22^nd day of March, 2018

¶48

J U D G M E N T

¶49

K. Vinod Chandran, J

¶50

The specific grievance of the petitioner was with respect to conduct of a General Body Meeting. The meeting has already been held, without any untoward incident on the protection afforded by the police. The police shall raise a bill for the aforesaid protection afforded, in accordance with G.O(Ms) No.183/ 2012/Home, dated 09.07.2012 and G.O(P) No. 16/13/Fin, dated 07.01.2013, which shall be paid by the petitioners.

¶51

The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there is an apprehension with respect to the hostilities being commenced against the head office building. The

¶52

WPC.No.9091/2018

¶53

: 2 :

¶54

petitioner has already approached the civil court and obtained an injunction. The petitioner's remedy is to approach the civil

¶55

court, if any violation is occasioned.

¶56

The learned Counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 5

¶57

submits on instruction that there is already a settlement entered into between the parties and there is no trouble as of now.

¶58

In such circumstance, the writ petition would stand closed. No costs.

¶59

Sd/-

¶60

K. VINOD CHANDRAN,

¶61

JUDGE

¶62

Sd/- ASHOK MENON, JUDGE

¶63

SB/23/03/2018

¶64

// true copy //

¶65

P.A to Judge

Catholic Syrian Bank v. T.N. Ramasubrahmanian

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Catholic Syrian Bank v. T.N. Ramasubrahmanian

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Hamara Hotels (P) Ltd., Vs the Intelligence Officer

M/S. Evm Passenger Cars India Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State of Kerala

P.C.Ramakrishnan Vs Circle Inspector of Police

Kannankutty Vs District Superintendant of Police

Arpookkara Grama Panchayat Vs Superintendent of Police

The Temple Advisory Committee of Thevalakkara Devaswom Vs Travancore Devaswom Board