George v. District Collector, Pathanamthitta
Case brief
What is this about?
None. This document is the aadmission note listing parties and exhibits, not the adjudication of the writ petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 24TH JYAISHTA, 1940
WP(C).No. 8889 of 2018
PETITIONER(S)
GEORGE AGED 73, S/O. DANIEL, R/AT MANJEERIL VEEDU, MUDIYOOR KONAM P.O., PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK - 689 501.
BY ADVS.SMT.T.S.MAYA (THIYADIL) SRI.K.RAJEEV (THIYADIL) SMT.K.A.SUNITHA
RESPONDENT(S)
1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689501.
2. THAHAZILDAR
- REVENUE RECOVERY (RR),
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
George Aged 73
- respondent
District Collector, Pathanamthitta District
- respondent
Thaha Zildar
- respondent
Village Officer Pandalam
- respondent
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court