Sindhu T.R. v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner, a substitute contingent worker, sought absorption into a vacancy. Court directed the Municipality to place her request before the Municipal Council for a decision.
What did the court decide?
Direct Third Respondent to place petitioner's representation before Municipal Council in next meeting for appropriate decision.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1939
WP(C).No. 4694 of 2018
PETITIONER :
SINDHU T.R. MURUGA VILASOM, KEEZHCHERIMEL, PULUKUNNU, CHENGANNUR-689121. (SUBSTITUTE CONTINGENT WORKER IN CHENGANNUR MUNICIPALITY)
BY ADV.SRI.C.A.RAJEEV
RESPONDENTS :
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2. DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS URBAN AFFAIRS DIRECTORATE, SWARAJ BHAVAN, KOWDIAR P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Substitute Contingent Worker should be directed to absorb a vacancy in Chengannur Municipality?
Whether the request of the petitioner for absorption should be placed before the Municipal Council?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sindhu T.R. Muruga Vilasom
- respondent
State of Kerala represented by the Secretary to Government, Local Self Government Department
- respondent
Director of Urban Affairs
- respondent
Chengannur Municipality represented by its Secretary
- respondent
The Municipal Council, Chengannur Municipality represented by its Chairman
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court