Allowed

K.P.Mohammed v. the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Malappuram

Kerala HC12 Feb 2018WP(C)/4666/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala, via a writ petition, directed the Regional Transport Authority to consider the petitioner's request for revising stage carriage timings within six weeks after holding a conference with interested operators.

What did the court decide?

The respondent directed to consider the request for revision of timings, hold a timing conference with interested operators, and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.

K.P.Mohammed Vs the Secretary, Regional Transport… — Landlord and Tenant | Kerala HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN

¶4

MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 23RD MAGHA, 1939

¶5

WP(C).No. 4666 of 2018

¶6

PETITIONER(S)

¶7

K.P.MOHAMMED, S/O KOYAMU, KIZHAKKUPARAMBAN HOUSE, KADAMBODE P.O., PANTHALLUR,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

¶8

BY ADV.SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA

¶9

RESPONDENT(S):

¶10

THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM , PIN-676 505.

¶11

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.S.SHEEJA

¶12

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-02-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶13

¶14

WP(C).No. 4666 of 2018 (G)

¶15

APPENDIX

¶16

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------EXHIBIT P1: PHOTOCOPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 22.01.2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.

¶17

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS - NIL ------------------------------

/TRUE COPY/

PS TO JUDGE

ANIL K.NARENDRAN, J.

¶22

----------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.4666 of 2018

¶23

Dated this the 12^th day of February, 2018

¶24

J U D G M E N T

¶25

The petitioner, who is the registered owner of a stage carriage bearing registration No.KL-08/AN-8892 operating on the route of Manjeri-Kalikavu (via) Pandikkad, Thuvvur, Karuvarakundu and Melattur with the timing settled on 15.6.1996, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent to consider Ext.P1 request made for revision of timings in respect of his stage carriage, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court, after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and other affected operators.

¶26

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.

¶27

Since Ext.P1 request submitted by the petitioner is pending consideration before the respondent, this writ petition is disposed of, without going into the merits of the case, by

¶28

W.P.(C)No.4666 of 2018

¶29

:-2-:

¶30

directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1 request made by the petitioner for revision of timings in respect of his stage carriage, strictly in accordance with law, after convening a timing conference, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, with notice to the petitioner and also to other interested operators.

¶31

Sd/-

¶32

ANIL K.NARENDRAN JUDGE

¶33

ami/14.2.18

¶34

//True copy//

¶35

P.A.to Judge

K.P.Mohammed v. the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Malappuram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.P.Mohammed v. the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Malappuram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.C.Antony Vs Jaison P.C

Drisya Vs the State of Kerala

Treesa John Vs Special Secretary Co. Operative Department

Philo V.K. Vs Thuruthipuram Service Co-Oiperative Bank

Jayakumar Vs Rishiraj Singh, I.P.S.

Ravindran Nair V.P Vs Kerala State Road Transport Corporation