C.E.Jose v. T.G.Ruby
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition by retired Headmaster challenging an order by authorities finding no merit in his complaint against a teacher. Court dismissed the petition noting lack of merit and long delay.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed. No costs awarded despite observation that it ought to have been dismissed with heavy costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY ,THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 22ND KARTHIKA, 1940
WP(C).No. 18250 of 2016
PETITIONER:
C.E.JOSE AGED 72, S/O.CHERUVATHOOR EYYAPPAN, CHERUVATHOOR HOUSE, KATTAKAMPAL, THRISUR DISTRICT, PIN 680 544.
BY ADVS.
SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM) SRI.C.THEJUS PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.PRASANTH M.P
RESPONDENTS:
- 1 T.G.RUBY
W/O.JOSEPH, NOW RESIDING AT KOLADY HOUSE, NEAR SCHOOL BUS STOP, PORKULAM (PO), THIRSSSUR DISTRICT, PIN 680 542.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging an order closing a service complaint against the petitioner requires interference by the Court.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to quash the proceedings initiated against the first respondent.
Whether the writ petition has merit considering the lapse of time and prior findings by statutory authorities.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.E.Jose
- respondent
T.G.Ruby
- respondent
The Assistant Educational Officer
- respondent
The Deputy Director of Education
- respondent
The Director of Public Instruction
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court