Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013, had come into force on 1.1.2014. Prior to 1.1.2014, award in respect of the abovesaid LA proceedings initiated against the petitioner was not passed. Hence this Court, as per Ext.P-4 judgment dated 7.6.2017 rendered in W.P.(C).No.12519/2017 had directed that, as Ext.P-2 award dated 17.6.2017 has been rendered under the Old Act, long after coming into force of the new Act, the competent authority concerned is legally obliged to pass a supplementary award under the new Act and this Court had thus directed the respondents as per Ext.P-4 judgment to render a supplementary award in the petitioner's case under the new Act within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Thereafter revised award as per Ext.P-5 was rendered on 12.10.2017. Being dissatisfied with the quantum of the compensation awarded thereby, the petitioner had immediately submitted Ext.P-6 petition/objection dated 28.10.2017 before the 2nd respondent Collector pointing out various aspects of the matter as to the alleged errors in quantifying the compensation and that the petitioner is legally entitled for grant of higher compensation. The request made by the petitioner in Ext.P-6 petition dated 28.10.2017 has been
