Rugmini v. K.J. Gopakumar
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses an appeal following an order in C.M. Application No.185 of 2014 and dismisses all pending interlocutory applications. No substantive reasoning is provided.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed; pending interlocutory applications dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 26TH MAGHA, 1939
UNNUMB.RSA.No. 185 of 2014
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23-11-2011 OF THE DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA IN AS 149/2006.
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30-06-2006 IN OS 47/2003 OF THE SUB COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA.
APPELLANTS/ADDITIONAL APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFF :
1. RUGMINI, AGED 48 YEARS, W/O LATE NARAYANAN NAIR, CHARUVILAPADINJATTATHIL VEEDU, MANNADI P.O, KALAIKKUM PADINJARE MURI, KADAMPANADU VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
2. DIVYA, AGED 22 YEARS, D/O LATE NARAYANAN NAIR, CHARUVILAPADINJATTATHIL VEEDU, MANNADI P.O, KALAIKKUM PADINJARE MURI, KADAMPANADU VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
3. HARIKRISHNAN, AGED 17 YEAARS, S/O LATE NARAYANAN NAIR, CHARUVILAPADINJATTATHIL VEEDU, MANNADI P.O, KALAIKKUM PADINJARE MURI, KADAMPANADU VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK (MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, THE FIRST APPELLANT HEREIN).
Parties & counsel
- appellant
RUGMINI
- appellant
DIVYA
- appellant
HARIKRISHNAN
- respondent
K.J. GOPAKUMAR
- respondent
INDU P.NAIR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court