Sreenivasan v. Monisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed the second appeal for non-prosecution as no representation was made by the appellant on the day fixed for hearing, and defects were not cured.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; all pending interlocutory applications dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 26TH MAGHA, 1939
SA.No. 307 of 2003
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08-08-2002 IN AS 187/1996 of DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD.
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28-10-1996 IN OS 353/1994 of MUNSIFF COURT, CHITTUR.
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT :
SREENIVASAN, S/O UNNI ALIAS KRISHNAN, RESIDING AT KUTTIPALLAM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.PRINCE K.ELIAS MS.P.K.RADHIKA.
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF :
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SREENIVASAN
- respondent
MONISHA
Coram
A.HARIPRASAD
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court