Disposed

Omana v. Prabhakara Panicker

Kerala HC29 Oct 2018RSA/864/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second appeal where the High Court of Kerala granted permission to the appellants to withdraw the appeal without prejudice, allowing them to institute a separate appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(u) CPC against impugned judgments. Disposal is restricted to this procedural direction.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the second appeal without prejudice to filing an appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(u) CPC.

Omana Vs Prabhakara Panicker — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Kerala HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

¶4

MONDAY,THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 7TH KARTHIKA, 1940

¶5

RSA.No. 864 of 2018

¶6

[AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23-03-2018 IN AS 67/2010 OF ADDL.SUB COURT,KOLLAM]

¶7

[AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28-02-2003 IN OS 280/1997 OF MUNSIFF-MAGISTRATE COURT, PARAVOOR]

¶8

APPELLANTS/ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 4,6,7,8 & 9/LRs. OF DEFENDANT NO.3 :

¶9

1 OMANA

¶10

AGED 61 YEARS

¶11

W/O. LATE SAHADEVAN, JAGATH BHAVAN, ERATHU CHERRY, MEENADU VILLAGE, CHATHANOOR.

¶12

2 DAYA PANICKER AGED 40 YEARS

¶13

D/O. LATE SAHADEVAN, JAGATH BHAVAN, ERATHU CHERRY, MEENADU VILLAGE, CHATHANOOR.

¶14

3 DEEPA THAMPAN AGED 38 YEARS

¶15

D/O. LATE SAHADEVAN, JAGATH BHAVAN, ERATHU CHERRY, MEENADU VILLAGE, CHATHANOOR.

¶16

4 DEEPI DEV AGED 35 YEARS

¶17

D/O. LATE SAHADEVAN, JAGATH BHAVAN, ERATHU CHERRY, MEENADU VILLAGE, CHATHANOOR.

¶18

5 SUBRU N.SAHADEV AGED 30 YEARS

¶19

S/O. LATE SAHADEVAN, JAGATH BHAVAN, ERATHU CHERRY, MEENADU VILLAGE, CHATHANOOR.

¶20

BY ADVS.

¶21

K.B. GANGESH SMT.ATHIRA A.MENON

¶22

RESPONDENTS/ADDL. APPELLANTS & RESPONDENTS 1,2 & ADDL.RESPONDENT

¶23

NO.5/LRs. OF PLAINTIFF :

¶24

1 PRABHAKARA PANICKER

¶25

AGED 70 YEARS

¶26

S/O. NEELAKANDAN VAIDYAN, KULATHILAZHIKATHU MELATHIL VEEDU, ERATHU CHERRY, MEENADU VILLAGE, CHATHANOOR - 671 572.

¶27

R.S.A. No. 864

¶28

¶29

2 BASANTH PRABHAKAR AGED 48 YEARS S/O PARABRAHMAKUMARI, KULATHILAZHIKATHU MELATHIL VEEDU, ERATHU CHERRY, MEENADU VILLAGE, CHATHANOOR - 671 572.

¶30

3 BIJU PRABHAKAR S/O. PARABRAHMAKUMARI, KULATHILAZHIKATHU MELATHIL VEEDU, ERATHU CHERRY, MEENADU VILLAGE, CHATHANOOR - 671 572.

¶31

4 BAIJU PRABHAKAR

¶32

S/O PARABRAHMAKUMARI, SREE VINAYAKOM MAMBALLIKUNNU, CHATHANOOR-691572, REPRESENTED BY PAO.

¶33

5 BINDU SREE AGED 44 YEARS D/O PARABRAHMAKUMARI, SREENIDHI APARTMENT NO.20, KASARGODE-671121.

¶34

6 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM-691013.

¶35

7 SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS ALC NOX, RESURVEY, KOLLAM-691001.

¶36

8 VISHNU KUMARI AGED 42 YEARS

¶37

D/O LATE SAHADEVAN, JAGATH BHAVAN, ERATHU CHERRY, MEENADU VILLAGE, CHATHANOOR-691572.

¶38

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.10.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶39

J U D G M E N T

¶40

The learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to

¶41

withdraw the second appeal without prejudice to the right of the appellants to institute an appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(u) of the Code of Civil Procedure challenging the impugned judgments. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant

¶42

R.S.A. No. 864

¶43

¶44

the permission sought by the learned counsel for the appellants. Ordered accordingly. The Registry is directed to return the certified copies of the impugned judgments.

Sd/-

P.B.SURESH KUMAR

JUDGE

PKK

Omana v. Prabhakara Panicker

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Omana v. Prabhakara Panicker

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Varghese R. George Vs K. Mohammed Y. Safirulla

M/S. Damac Holding Pvt.Ltd. Vs M.N.Rajendran

Safia T.B Vs K.Mohammed Y Safirulla IAS

Sherry Vs Paul (60)

J.K.Vijendran Vs Theresa Alex

Ibrahimkutty Mohammed Ismail Vs S. Pathmuth