This single-paragraph order finally heard a contempt case involving a petitioner and a respondent, explicitly stating that the case is closed without prejudice to the petitioner's right to challenge the related original order.
The contempt case was closed without prejudice to the petitioner's right to challenge the earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 2ND KARTHIKA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 317 of 2018 IN WP(C). 30192/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 30192/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 20-09-2017
PETITIONER:
M/S. DAMAC HOLDING PVT.LTD. 33/2440E, COMPASS, THAMMANAM, ERNAKULAM - 682 032, REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR, C. BALASUBRAMANIAM.
BY ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY
RESPONDENT:
M.N.RAJENDRAN FATHER NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, CONVENOR, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE OF THRIKKAKARA NORTH AND AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, PUKKATTUPADI ROAD, KALAMASSERY - 682 021.
BY ADV. SRI P.M SATEESH GP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24.10.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 317 of 2018
2
JUDGMENT
Without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the order passed in compliance with the direction issued by this Court, this contempt case is
closed.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
JUDGE
Mn/24.10.2018
Con.Case(C).No. 317 of 2018
3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
| ANNEXURE-1 | THE CERTIFIED COPY OF No. 30192 DATED 20/09/ |
THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C) 2017. |
|---|---|---|
| ANNEXURE-2 | THE TRUE COPY OF RESPONDENT. |
THE LETTER TO THE |
| //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE |
M/S. DAMAC HOLDING PVT.LTD.
M.N.RAJENDRAN
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
