Dismissed
Acquatics v. Thrissur Corporation
Kerala HCRSA/702/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
THURSDAY ,THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1940
RSA.No. 702 of 2004
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN A.S 475/2003 of DISTRICT COURT,THRISSUR DATED 10-02-2004
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN O.S 901/1997 of II ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, THRISSUR DATED 08-04-2003
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
ACQUATICS, ARISTO ROAD, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DR.K.S.MOHAN, BLESSING, KOKKALAI, THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.R.KRISHNA RAJ
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
1 THRISSUR CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, THRISSUR CORPORATION,, M.O.ROAD, THRISSUR.
2 VIJAYAN S/O.NELLIKKAL KUNJUNNY CHELAKKOTTUKARA DESOM, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR.
R1 BY SRI. SANTHOSH P.PODUVAL, SC, THRISSUR CORPORATION R2 BY SRI.C.D.DILEEP
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RSA.No. 702 of 2004 2
JUDGMENT
The counsel for the appellant submitted that there is no instruction from the parties in spite of notice. Nobody has represented the matter for and on behalf of the appellant.
Hence, dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE
msp
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
Acquatics
Thrishur Corporation
Vijayan
P.SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court