Mamatha Devi v. Suseela
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court dismissed the regular second appeal as infructuous without detailed reasoning. No substantive legal principles were articulated in this brief order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 30TH KARTHIKA, 1940
RSA.No. 600 of 2004 (D)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 22.7.2003 IN AS No.274/1999 of III ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 29.9.1998 IN OS No.1945/1996 of PRL.MUNSIFF'S COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
APPELLANTS: (APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS)
- 1 MAMATHA DEVI, D/o SADANANDINI,
RESIDING AT REVEENDRA VILASATHU VEEDU, CHENCHERI MURI, ULLOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2 S. RAVEENDRAN THULASIDAS, RAVEENDRA VILASOM, CHENCHERI MURI, ULLOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
1 MAMATHA DEVI
- appellant
2 S. RAVEENDRAN THULASIDAS
- respondent
1 SUSEELA
- respondent
2 VANITY GRASS
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court