Rajan v. P.H.Shereef
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed a regular second appeal filed against lower court decrees. Counsel argued the appeal abated as the sole respondent had died. Pending interlocutory applications were also dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as abated; pending interlocutory applications stood dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1939
RSA.No. 447 of 2006
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 2.6.2005 IN AS 208/2003 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, NORTH PARAVUR
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 31.10.2001 IN OS 57/1997 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, NORTH PARAVUR
APPELLANT IN RSA/APPELLANT IN AS/PLAINTIFF IN OS
RAJAN, S/O. MUNDAKAMALI KURIAN, ALLAPRA KARA, VENGOLA VILLAGE.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.)
SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR
SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the regular second appeal abated due to the death of the sole respondent.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
RAJAN
- respondent
P.H.SHEREEF, SHINMEY STORES, P.P.ROAD, PERUMBAVOOR
Coram
A. HARIPRASAD
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court