Vasudevan Nair v. Vilasini
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed a second appeal as time barred following an order in a curative motion application. Pending interlocutory applications were also closed.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed as time barred; pending interlocutory applications are closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 8TH PHALGUNA, 1939
RSA.No. 15 of 2009 (B)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.10.2007 IN AS NO.1/2003 OF
SUB COURT, NEDUMANGAD
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.06.2001 IN OS NO.253/1993 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT,NEDUMANGAD
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/4TH DEFENDANT
VASUDEVAN NAIR, S/O.SIVARAMA PILLAI,
AGED 58, MOHANAVILASOM VEEDU, NEDUMKADU KARAMANA,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.L.MOHANAN
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal is maintainable in view of the non-prosecution order in C.M. application.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vasudevan Nair
- respondent
Vialasini
- respondent
Bhaskaran Nair
- respondent
Chakrapani Nair
- respondent
Gopinathan Nair
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court