K.C.Antony v. Fr.Mathew Anthiyamkulam
Case brief
What is this about?
A second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to lack of representation despite notices.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; interlocutory applications dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1939
RSA.No. 30 of 2008 (C)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21-08-2007 IN AS NO.71/2006 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THODUPUZHA.
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23-12-2005 IN OS NO.57/2004 of
SUB COURT,KATTAPPANA.
FULL NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF
K.C.ANTONY, S/O.CHACKO, AGED 70 YEARS, KALAPURACKAL (H), KUZHITHOLU KARA,
KARUNAPURAM VILLAGE, UDUMBACHOLA TALUK.
BY ADV.SRI.T.J.MICHAEL
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.C. Antony
- respondent
Fr. Mathew Anthiyamkulam
- respondent
CMI Congregation
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court