Sreedevi v. B.Sindhu
Case brief
What is this about?
The regular second appeal was heard where the parties filed a memo of settlement out of court. The appellate court recorded the settlement and dismissed the appeal as not pressed, including all pending interlocutory applications.
What did the court decide?
The regular second appeal was dismissed as not pressed; all pending interlocutory applications were dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1939
RSA.No. 1334 of 2015(A)
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 11-08-2015 IN AS NO.158/2009 of SUB COURT,KOTTARAKKARA AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 22-10-2009 IN OS NO. 33/2007 of MUNSIFF'S COURT, PUNALUR
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/1ST DEFENDANT:
SREEDEVI, AED 40 YEARS, D/O.CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR, SREEMANDIRAM, KAMUKUMCHERRY, KARIYARA P.O, PIDAVOOR VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.SIVADASAN SRI.SAJU.S.A
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF & 2ND DEFENRNT:
- B.SINDHU, AGED 47 YEARS,
D/O.SANTHAKUMARI AMMA, AYODHYA, DECENT JUNCTION, VETTILATHAZHAM MURI, THRIKKOVILVATTOM VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK,PIN - 691 001.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sree Devi
- respondent
B. Sindhu
- respondent
Sreekumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court