This regular second appeal by Chonari Nabeesa and Chonari Amina was dismissed for non-prosecution as they failed to appear despite notice and lacked representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
FRIDAY ,THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA, 1940
RSA.No. 292 of 2004
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN A.S 87/2000 of I ADDL.SUB COURT, KOZHIKODE DATED 30-09-2002 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN O.S 345/1996 of PRL.MUNSIFF'S COURT, KOZHIKODE-I DATED 08-10-1999
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:
1 CHONARI NABEESA, AGED 42 YEARS W/O.SAIDALAVI, RESIDING AT PANDARAKANDY PARAMBA, PANNIYANKARA AMSOM DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
1 CHONARI MOIDEEN, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.ALAVI, RESIDING AT VELLARIKANDY PARAMBA,, PANNIYANKARA AMSOM DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RSA.No. 292 of 2004 2
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that, there is no instruction from the appellants in spite of notice. Nobody else represented the matter for and on behalf of the appellants. Hence, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the appeal for non prosecution.
Appeal dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
msp
CHONARI NABEESA
CHONARI AMINA
CHONARI MOIDEEN
C.SUHARABI
CHONARI PATHUMMA
PSOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
