Thampy v. Prabhakaran Pillai
Case brief
What is this about?
This appeal is dismissed as abated because the respondent no. 1 and respondent no. 2, the only respondents in the appeal, passed away without their legal heirs being impleaded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
FRIDAY,THE 09TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018/18TH KARTHIKA, 1940
RSA.No.128 of 2005
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 12-03-2003 IN AS NO.193/1998 OF THE DISTRICT COURT, COURT, KOTTAYAM
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.7.1998 IN OS NO.309/1994 of MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHANGANACHERRY
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
1 THAMPY, S/O.VARKEY ALIAS VARKEY EAPEN, AGED 60, ERUPPACKAL, MALAYILAYAKATTIL VEETTIL, NEDUMGADAPPALLY KARA,KARUKACHAL VILLAGE, REP.BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MATHEW VARGHESE, AGED 51, KUTTANIL HOUSE, ERUPPACKAL BHAGOM, KARUKACHAL VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK.
2 THANKAMMA, D/O.VARKEY, AGED 63, ERUPPACKAL, MALAYILAYAKATTIL VEETTIL, NEDUMGADAPPALLY KARA, KARUKACHAL VILLAGE.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Thampy
- appellant
Thankamma
- respondent
Prabhakaran Pillai
- respondent
Santhakumariamma
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court