A regular second appeal against a District Court judgment was filed by K.Narayanan. The court heard the matter on 08.11.2018. The sole submission by the appellant's counsel was that the appellant did not wish to proceed with the appeal.
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
THURSDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 17TH KARTHIKA, 1940
RSA.No. 1234 of 2005 (E)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CMA No. 264/2000 of DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD,
DATED 28.07.2005
AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.No.1382/98 IN OS No.38/1998 of SUB COURT, PALAKKAD, DATED 16.07.1998
st APPELLANT/APPELLANT/1 RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
K.NARAYANAN, S/o KANNAPPA MANNADIAR, AGED 40 YEARS, KARNAKI NAGAR, KODUVAYUR AMSOM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY
SRI.V.RAGHUVARAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/CLAIM PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS NOT PARTY/DEFENDANT:
1 P.R.PRASAD, S/o RAMA MANNADIAR, NEAR POST OFFICE, KODUVAYUR AMSOM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
2 P.R.KRISHNAKUMAR, S/o RAMA MANNADIAR, NEAR POST OFFICE, KODUVAYUR AMSOM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
R.S.A.No.1234 of 2005
2
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant do not want to proceed with the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
DMR/-
K.NARAYANAN
P.R.PRASAD
P.R.KRISHNAKUMAR
P.SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
