Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Santhamma Vs Gopinatha Pillai — Kerala HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

Home
Kerala HC
2018
Santhamma Vs Gopinatha PillaiSanthamma v. Gopinatha Pillai

Dismissed

Santhamma v. Gopinatha Pillai

Kerala HC1 Mar 2018RSA/1009/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Advertisement

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD

THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1939

RSA.No. 1009 of 2004

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 22-01-2000 IN AS 52/1995 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-I, MAVELIKKARA

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 23-01-1995 IN OS 212/1992 of MUNSIFF COURT, HARIPAD

APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4/DEFENDANTS 2 TO 4

1 SANTHAMMA, AGED 35 YEARS, W/O. RAMESAN, MUTHUKULAM VADAKKUM MURI, MUTHUKULAM VILLAGE.

2 BALAKRISHNA PANICKER, AGED 42 YEARS,

B.V.NIVAS, DO. DO.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Santhamma
appellant
Balakrishna Panicker
appellant
Vijayamma
respondent
Gopinatha Pillai
respondent
Rema Devi
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 1 Mar 2018 · March
Registered: 24 Aug 2004
Case no.: RSA/1009/2004

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from A.hariprasad

Paru Karthiyayani Vs Retnamma
28 Feb 2018
Rajan Vs P.H.Shereef
28 Feb 2018
Nadankutty Nadar Joseph Vs Nadankutty Nadar Varghese
28 Feb 2018
Nazeedudeen. M Vs M. Basheer
1 Mar 2018

Cite this judgement

Santhamma v. Gopinatha Pillai, RSA/1009/2004 (KL), decided on 1 March 2018.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

A. Hariprasad

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Advertisement

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

3 VIJAYAMMA, DO. DO.

BY ADV.SRI.B.RENJITH KUMAR

RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS 1 & 2 & 1ST RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFFS 1 & 2 & 1ST DEFENDANT:

1. GOPINATHA PILLAI, KOCHUPARAMBIL, MUTHUKULAM VADAKKUM MURI, MUTHUKULAM VILLAGE.

2. REMA DEVI, DO. DO.

3. REMESAN SANTHALAYAM, MUTHUKULAM VADAKKUM MURI, MUTHUKULAM VILLAGE.

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-03-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

A. HARIPRASAD, J.

R.S.A.No.1009 of 2004

Dated this the 01^st day of March, 2018

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that

despite intimating the parties, they have not turned up. The matter comes up in the defect list. Steps have not been taken so far. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed.

SD/- A. HARIPRASAD JUDGE

JV

Remesan Santhalayam

Coram

AI extract

A. Hariprasad

CNR

KLHC010293172004

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION

The Plantation Corpn. Vs a.K.Mohammedkunhi

1 Mar 2018

Rajan & Another Vs Renjitha & Others

1 Mar 2018