Dismissed
P.P.Bava v. P.P.Mohammed Yasin
Kerala HCRP/904/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2018 / 19TH POUSHA, 1939
RP.No. 904 of 2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 31610/2017 DATED 04-10-2017
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/6TH RESPONDENT.
P.P.BAVA, S/O. LATE P.K.N. KUNHAMMED, AGED 70 YEARS, NALANKANDATHIL HOUSE, KOOTTAYI P.O, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV.SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5,7& 8:
1. P.P.MOHAMMED YASIN, AGED 67 YEARS, S/O. MOHAMMEDKUTTY, MANAGER, M.M.M.H.S.S AND SECRETARY, KOOTTAYI HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE, KOOTTAYI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676001.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHI, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN-695001.
3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM-676505.
4. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MINI CIVIL STATION, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 676505.
RP.No. 904 of 2017
5. DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL AND REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES), MINI CIVIL STATION, MALAPPURAM PIN-676505.
6. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MINI CIVIL STATION, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 676101.
7. DR. C.M. AKTHAR, PRESIDENT, KOOTTAYI HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE, REGD.NO. 13/1960, P.O. KOOTTAYI, MALAPPURAM-676562.
8. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THRIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
R1 TO R6, R8 BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN R BY SRI.SAJU.S.A
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-01-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sdr/-
RP.No. 904 of 2017
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE COMMITTEE DATED 10.03.2017 ANNEXURE A2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 11.3.2017 ANNEXURE A3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 6.4.2017
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES NIL
/TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE
sdr/-
P.V.ASHA, J.
R.P.No.904 of 2017
Dated this the 9th day of January, 2018
ORDER
Since I have already directed the Government to pass orders after affording an opportunity of hearing to the review petitioner also who is the 6th respondent in the writ petition, I do not think it necessary to review the judgment at the instance of the 6th respondent. The review petition is dismissed.
Sd/- P.V.ASHA JUDGE
rkc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether it is necessary to review the judgment in the underlying writ petition at the instance of the 6th respondent.
P.P.BAVA
P.P.MOHAMMED YASIN
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL AND REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES)
P.V.ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court