Jaganadha Kurukkal v. Bhavani Amma Santha
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
WEDNESDAY,THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018/28TH BHADRA, 1940
RP.No.630 of 2018 IN OP(C). 2597/2013
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 14.6.2018 IN I.A.NO.863/2018 IN OP(C)NO.2597/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
JAGANADHA KURUKKAL, AGED 63 YEARS REPRESENTING LATE PURSHOTHAMA KURUKKAL, MAVARATHALA MADATHIL VEEDU, PEROORKKADA.P.O., KUDAPPANAKKUNNU VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 005.
BY ADVS.SRI.DIPU.R
SMT.K.P.SUSMITHA
SRI.R.PRADEEP (TRIVANDRUM) SRI.SANAL P.RAJ
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 BHAVANI AMMA SANTHA MAVARATHALAMELE PUTHEN VEEDU,N.C.C.ROAD, PEROORKKADA P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 005.(DIED)
2 SUKUMARA PILLAI CHANDRAN MAVARATHALAMELE PUTHEN VEEDU,N.C.C.ROAD, PEROORKKADA P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 005.
3 SUKUMARA PILLAI VIJAYAN MAVARATHALAMELE PUTHEN VEEDU,N.C.C.ROAD, PEROORKKADA P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 005.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.09.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
R.P.No.630 of 2018
:: 2 ::
O R D E R
When the Review Petition was taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is not pressing the petition as it was filed for reviewing the order dismissing the original petition for default. The submission is recorded. The Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/
P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE
ahz/
JAGANADHA KURUKKAL
LATE PURSHOTHAMA KURUKKAL
BHAVANI AMMA SANTHA
SUKUMARA PILLAI CHANDRAN
SUKUMARA PILLAI VIJAYAN
P. SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court