Jose Issac v. Biju
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed petitions challenging an appellate order substituting a prohibitory injunction with a direction to maintain status quo. The Court directed parties to maintain the interim order during the pendency of the underlying suits.
What did the court decide?
Parties directed to maintain the interim order of the High Court pending disposal of the suits.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018 / 28TH BHADRA, 1940
OP(C).No. 724 of 2018 (O)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CMA 6/2016 of SUB COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA, DATED 19-12-2017
PETITIONER - RESPONDENT IN CMA/PETITIONER IN IA/PLAINTIFF IN THE SUIT
JOSE ISSAC, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O. ITHAKKU,KULAKKATTUMADATHIL HOUSE, KIZHAKOMBU KARA,KOOTHATTUKULAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 686 662.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN
SRI.P.B.SUBRAMANYAN SRI.P.M.NEELAKANDAN SRI.SABU GEORGE
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS IN CMA/RESPONDENTS IN IA/DEFENDANTS IN
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jose Issac
- respondent
Biju
- respondent
Issac
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court