Vijayan a v. Jyothish K.P
Case brief
What is this about?
A review petition challenging the earlier judgment in a returnable writ petition concerning gratuity appeal proceedings was allowed. The writ petition was restored to file.
What did the court decide?
The review petition is allowed and the writ petition is restored to file.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY ,THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018 / 26TH BHADRA, 1940
RP.No. 531 of 2018 IN WP(C).33997/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 33997/2016 DATED 24-10-2016
REVIEW PETITIONER/S:
VIJAYAN A., AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.KANNAN, ANOTH HOUSE, KOOVODE P.O., THALIPARAMBA, KANNUR-670 001.
BY ADV. SRI.V.R.KESAVA KAIMAL
RESPONDENT/S:
1 JYOTHISH K.P., PROPRIETOR, GEETHA BAKERY, SOUTH BAZAR, KANNUR-670 002, RESIDING AT KRISHNA KRIPA, PAPPINISSERY P.O.,BEHIND BINDU TALKIES, KANNUR DISTRICT.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the review petition should be allowed to restore the writ petition to file due to procedural irregularities in the discharge of the appeal.
Whether the third respondent has the standing to file the review petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
VIJAYAN A.
- respondent
JYOTHISH K.P.
- respondent
THE REGIONAL JOINT LABOUR COMMISSIONER
- respondent
THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court