Sasidharan and Another v. P.J.Thomas and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Regular First Appeal, filed by Sasidharan and others, was dismissed by this Court on the grounds that it had not been pressed in court and no prosecution was pending.
The Regular First Appeal, filed by Sasidharan and others, was dismissed by this Court on the grounds that it had not been pressed in court and no prosecution was pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 17TH MAGHA, 1939
RFA.No. 568 of 2008 (c)
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN OS 36/2004 OF SUB COURT,KATTAPPANA DATED
30-03-2007
APPELLANT(S)/DEFENDANTS:
BY ADV.SRI.C.A.JOY
RESPONDENT(S)/PLAINTIFFS:
1. P.J.THOMAS, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O JOSEPH PARANJATTUMATTATHIL HOUSE, THOOKUPALAM KARA, PARATHODU VILLAGE.
2. VIJAYAKUMAR, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNANACHARI, PUTHENVEEDU, THANNIMOODU,, KOMBAYAR KARA, PARATHODU VILLAGE.
3. MANIACHARI, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.KUTTAPPANACHARI, BLOCK NO. 1083, RAMAKKALMEDU KARA, KARUNAPURAM VILLAGE.
4. G.PRASANNAN, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.GOPINATHAN NAIR, PULIKKAL HOUSE, THOOKUPALAM KARA, KARUNAPURAM VILLAGE.
5. SUNNY, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.JOHN, PALATHADATHILL HOUSE, RAMAKKALMEDU KARA, KARUNAPURAM VILLAGE.
R1-R5 BY ADV. SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-02-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BKA/
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
R.F.A. No. 568 of 2008
Dated this the 6th day of February, 2018
J U D G M E N T
The R.F.A. is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE
bka/
Sasidharan
Indira
P.J. Thomas
Vijayakumar
Maniachari
G. Prasannan
K. Abraham Matthew
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court