Abdul Hassan v. Muhammed Aazim
Case brief
What is this about?
In this first appeal from an interim injunction order, the Court held that since the underlying suit for declaration is posted for trial, the appeal does not require disposal on merits. The judgment closed the appeal, directing the trial court to decide the suit without delay.
What did the court decide?
The FAO is closed without disposal on merits; the trial court shall dispose of the suit without delay.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 17TH MAGHA, 1939
FAO.No. 20 of 2011
-------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.1253 OF 2010 IN OS 213/2010 DATED 15-10-2010 OF SUB COURT, ATTINGAL
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF:
ABDUL HASSAN, S/O.MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA, HASPAN BROTHER, MANAKKADU VILAKOM,, KANIYAPURAM, PALLIPURAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.P.SHINOD SRI.P.GOVIND SRI.MANU V. SRI.RAM MOHAN.G.
RESPONDENT/COUNTER PETITIONER/7TH DEFENDANT:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against the dismissal of an interim injunction application should be disposed of on merits or closed based on the trial posting.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
ABDUL HASSAN
- respondent
MUHAMMED AAZIM
Coram
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court