Anilkumar v. Treesa
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging a Family Court order permitting amendment of pleadings to enhance a monetary claim. The High Court found the lower court failed to address paramount principles of amendment law.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order setting aside; matter remanded to Family Court for fresh disposal.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR
FRIDAY ,THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 23RD KARTHIKA, 1940
OP (FC).No. 393 of 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 314/2013 of FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA DATED 04-06-2018
PETITIONERS:
1 ANILKUMAR
AGED 53 YEARS
MULLETHU PADINJARE VARIUM VEEDU,CHEPPAD MURI, CHINGOLI VILLAGE,CHEPPAD (P.O.), ALAPPUZHA DISTRIC.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether an order allowing amendment of pleadings altering the nature and character of the suit violates Article 227.
Whether the Family Court applied the legal principles governing amendment of pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.
Whether the amendment introduced time-barred claims without examining diligence or prejudice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ANILKUMAR
- petitioner
NIRMALA
- respondent
TREESA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court