Babu N. v. Sandhya
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an interim Family Court order granting custody of a minor child to the mother pending the main trial. Found no patent illegality or impropriety.
What did the court decide?
Original petition dismissed; dismissal does not bar petitioner from seeking modification of interim custody arrangement; Family Court directed to dispose of original petition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. NARAYANA PISHARADI
MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 4TH ASHADHA, 1940
OP (FC).No. 350 of 2018 (AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.5.2018 IN I.A.NO.1183/2018 IN O.P.NO.429/2018 OF THE FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR)
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
BABU N., S/O.KUTHAMBULLY THERUVIL NATARAJAN, AGED 37 YEARS, KANIYARKKODE VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR-680 594.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA SMT.MEGHA K.XAVIER
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
SANDHYA, D/O.KUTHAMBULLY THERUVIL PAZHANISWAMI, AGED 24 YEARS, KANIYARKKODE VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR-680 594.
THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-06-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere with the Family Court's interim custody order under Article 227.
Whether the Family Court committed any patent illegality, irregularity, or impropriety in granting interim custody of the minor child to the mother.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Babu N.
- respondent
Sandhya
Coram
C.K. Abdul Rehim
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court