Rajan v. Suprabha
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition under Article 226, this Court declined to interfere with an execution order directing the petitioner to deposit Rs. 50,000. However, the Court directed the Family Court to expedite and decide the petitioner's belated applications to set aside the ex-parte decree within two months.
What did the court decide?
Directing the Family Court to consider IA Nos. 4159/2017 and 4160/2017 at the earliest and pass appropriate orders within two months.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
& THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. NARAYANA PISHARADI
MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 4TH ASHADHA, 1940
OP (FC).No. 347 of 2018
(AGAINST THE ORDER OF E.P.NO.16/2015 IN O.P.NO.632/2012 OF FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
RAJAN AGED 63, S/O.KORATTIPARAMBIL KOCHUKUTTAN, KARALAM VILLAGE, KEEZHTHANI DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR-680 701.
BY ADV.SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
SUPRABHA, W/O.RAJAN, KORATTIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KARALAM VILLAGE, KEEZHTHANI DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR-680 701.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Family Court's order directing payment of decree amount in an execution proceeding.
Whether the High Court can direct the Family Court to expedite consideration of the petitioner's late applications to set aside an ex-parte decree.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajan
- respondent
Suprabha
Coram
C.K. Abdul Rehim
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court